Google allegly took out a few major

Link networks over the weekend. came in for special mention from Matt Cutts. So why are Google mak a point of tak out link networks if link networks don’t work? Well it’s cause link networks work. How do we know? Look at the back link profiles in any SERP area where there is a lot of money to made and the area isn’t overly corporate i.e. not dominat by major brands and it won’t long fore you spot aggressive link networks and few “legitimate” links in the backlink profiles. Sure you wouldn’t want aggressive link networks point at brand sites as there are tter approaches brand sites can take when it comes to digital market but such evidence makes a mockery of the tips some people are freely hand out. Are such tips the result of conjecture repeat Google’s recommendations or actual test in the wild.

Either the link networks work

Or they don’t work but don’t affect ranks or these sites shouldn’t rank. There’s a good reason some of those tips are free I guess. Risk Management Really it’s a question of risk. Could these sites get hit eventually? May. However those us a “disposable domain” approach will do anyth that works as far as link goes as their main risk is not rank. penalis is an Home Furniture Equipment Stores Email List occupational hazard not game-over. These sites will continue so long as Google’s algorithmic treatment rewards them with higher rank. If your domain is crucial to your brand then you might choose to stay away from SEO entirely depend on how you define “SEO”. A lot of digital market isn’t really SEO in the traditional sense i.e. optimiz hard against an algorithm in order to gain higher ranks a lot of digital market is bas.

On optimization for people

Job Function Email Database

Treat SEO as a side nefit. There’s noth wrong with this of course and it’s a great approach for many sites and someth we advocate. Most sites end up somewhere along that continuum but no matter where you are on that scale there’s always a market risk to manag with perhaps “non-performance” a risk that is often gloss over. So if there’s a take-away it’s this: check out what actually happens in the wild and then evaluate your risk fore emulat it. When pundits suggest a rule check to see if you can ALB directory spot times it appears to work and perhaps more interestly when it doesn’t. It’s in those areas of personal inquiry and test where gems of SEO insight are found. SEO has always en a mix of art and science. You can test but only so far. The art part is deal with the unknown past the test point.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *