Rosenhan did not criticize that malingerers were admitt (finally in any field of health in general, and mental health in particular, the diagnosis is made taking into account the statement of symptoms of the patient who cannot be suspect of lying). but that the hypothesis of mental illness was maintain despite the apparent good mental health of the patients. Rosenhan and the other pseudopatients also report the dehumanization, invasion of privacy, and borom they suffer while hospitaliz. They report that although the staff seem well-intention, they generally dehumaniz patients ; For example, they often discuss patients in their presence as if they were not there, and avoid direct contact with patients except when their obligations demand it.
Bluntly Calls "German Hatred" the
Some aides verbally and physically abus patients when other staff members were not present. They didn’t receive visitors either. The average contact with psychiatrists, psychologists and residents, all of them together, was an average of 6.8 minutes b2b email list per day. Rosenhan’s work generat strong controversies upon publication . And it coincid with the rais voice of the members of the anti-psychiatric movement and the humanistic movement in Psychology of the 70s. We remember having visit the classic Víctor Larco Herrera mental hospital more than once and seeing that the living and coexistence conditions are not always the best in that place.
Work of This Now
The customer is very important, the customer will be followed by the customer. Political and administrative indifference counteracts the good intentions of health professionals who still maintain the Hippocratic promise of help and respect for those who suffer. Reviewing academic texts we see that it was worse previously. It hurts to recognize that there is no interest in mental health in our institutions , except for some exceptions that are limit to suitable personnel and conscious and sensitive specialists, but not as a public policy, not as a government priority. After this work by Rosenhan we can ask ourselves: Could it be that mical diagnoses are not always as accurate as we assume? Could it be that the symptoms ALB Directory are not so much in the patient but in the particular ( propathological ) view of the “specialist”? How many doctors or how many psychologists and psychotherapists can fall into the same situation that Rosenhan found?
