3. Премиум-программа по цифровому маркетингу в Мальвия Нагар – Школа интернет-маркетинга Школа интернет-маркетинга снабжает студентов реальными навыками и опытом в […]
Digital Marketing
Free movement and rights “derived” from (dual) EU citizenship
Family life under scrutiny by the CJEU in the Lounes case Freedom of movement! for European citizens! is one of
The Twilight of the Jamaica Hypothesis
Comparative Observations on the Government Formation Negotiations in Germany A significant portion of the comments on the latest German political
The Zanda-Filippin bill proposal on countering fake news on social networks: problematic profiles
On November 27! il foglio.it published the draft bill developed within the parliamentarymajority and prepared at the initiative of
Damages-based enforcement of procurement rules & EU tort law
As a last thought! I think it is worth stressing that! in addition to the practical difficulties derived from
Maximum harmonization through a revised remedies directive?
However! this approach is not without some practical difficulties! as there is a thick mist of uncertainty concerning what is
Minimum harmonization through the Remedies Directive
This led it to reach the view that A simple breach of public procurement law is in itself sufficient
The EFTA Court’s approach
Therefore! the UK Supreme Court takes the clear view that the existence of grounds for an EU damages action based
The UK Supreme Court’s approach
However! perhaps surprisingly! Spijker is not (yet) universally seen as having settled the issue of the interaction between the actions for damages
Opposing approaches to the procurement remedies-State liability interaction
One of the disputed issues in academic! and now also judicial! debate around public procurement remedies is the relationship
Some thoughts on maximum and minimum EU harmonization
A propos the interaction between procurement remedies and the principle of State After I published some comments on the EFTA
Redistricting Plans and Partisan Gerrymandering
Observations and Precedents Pending from the Supreme Court in Gill v. Whitford The Supreme Court opened the new term on October 3,